Censoring the ice-kachang?

Didn't get much sleep,especially the last two days as have to prepare to work at midnite. And I hardly sleep in the day. Or do it only when I am sick.

I had so many things I wanted to blog about, at that point in time, there were points I wanted to put down here, but in the end, as I didn't get the opportunity to blog, I have forgotten what I want to say. Not that it matter. Just something in my head that I wanted to put down in words, as at that time it seemed a good idea. I suppose when one has the opportunity, whether it be blogging online or telling your friends, it all comes down to having a "friend" around. And it is luck that plays a part. If luck brings two entity together, person and machine or person and person, then there will be "conversation". Of course one can still converse with oneself when alone, but that will make the perception that one seems to be insane, mad, crazy with all the screws loose. But if one is already insane, it doesn't matter what others think, rite? haha

Read in the paper of this Nominated MP bringing the debate on Section 377A, basically about the rights of the gays. Maybe those against the appeal have a point or two, but I see it more about legalising the gay's behaviour. It is more to giving the people a right in deciding what to want. Just like censoring, more recent being "Lust:Caution" which had several people writing to the newspaper, and more online. How do you let a person grows up and learn to make decision if the decisions are always make for him? "You can't do this, you can't do that!" We got the rating so let the rating be the guide. Going to watch a cut movie is like eating an ice-kachang without the syrup or less syrup as it is fattening. I may as well don't buy it. I want to eat ice-kachang because I want the taste, all sweetness and the miscellanous ingrediences that make the dessert so wonderful to eat.

Let us be an adult, guide us if you want but don't take away what we can decide for ourselves. Sure, the mass community must be protected. But it doesn't do any good by sweeping the dirt under the carpet and tell them that the world is nice and goody-goody. Sometimes the forbidden food brings more evil, luring the innocent wanting to do it. I am sure Adam is a familiar example.

Perhaps not seeing the whole version of the movie will not be much, but as for the gay issue, perhaps the BIG BROTHER should be more compassionate towards them. In the first place, they can't help being who they are. Give them their space, if you don't want the kids to follow their examples, you explain to your kids. At least they will understand, and learn to be a more humane society.